Tags
Under the header of my blog title, Gringo Suelto, it says, “Musings from Boston, Mexico City, and Beyond!” Well, I’ve posted plenty of musings from Mexico City, at least one “beyond,” but so far none from Boston. So I thought I’d try to remedy that today.
Yesterday afternoon I decided to strap on a pair of rollerblades and take my camera out and around my neighborhood. It was a beautiful day, with moderate temperatures, light clouds, and intermittent good light, so a good day for photographs. And fall is the most beautiful time of year here, with the trees turning, the air cooling, and the sun moving lower in the sky.
This should also be a nice look at an interesting, but (at least touristically) under-appreciated part of Boston. I live in a neighborhood called “Savin Hill,” which is part of a larger neighborhood called Dorchester. (“Dot” to the time-starved natives.) Up until it was annexed by Boston in 1870, Dorchester was a separate city, immediately to the south of Central Boston. Dorchester, and particularly my part of it is one of the oldest parts of Boston. According to Wikipedia, on May 30, 1630, Captain Squib of the ship Mary and John entered Boston Harbor and on June 17, 1630, landed a boat with eight men on the Dorchester shore, at what was then a narrow peninsula known as Mattapan or Mattaponnock, and today is known as Columbia Point (more popularly since 1984 as Harbor Point), which is very close to where I live. The English settled the area immediately upon landing as it had good agricultural land, and the salt marsh was good for feeding livestock. As one of the oldest settled parts of the city, it benefits from a rich architectural tradition, with many fine houses, parks, and public buildings. It is also a part of the city that sees very few tourists, despite a some interesting attractions and beautiful, old houses.
I am fortunate to live across the street from a roughly 20-acre park, which is mostly open space, bordered by large, old oaks. The park is popular all year round, with a nice view of the bay from the top of the hill, a tennis court, and basketball court. The area shown is a popular place to toboggan in the winter. (There is a steeper bit just out of view.)
Not too far away is the Dorchester North Burial Ground, one of the oldest in the city. First laid out in 1634, it is the final resting place of two colonial governors, William Stoughton, who was also Chief Justice during the Salem witch trials of 1692; and William Tailer. More info can be found on the City’s website here.
I was fortunate to grab a shot just as the sun came out from behind the clouds. Unfortunately, I was not able to enter the cemetery as it is open by appointment only. So don’t just drop dead and expect to be buried there.
Proceeding north along Columbia Road to the corner of Massachusetts Avenue (Mass Ave to the locals), we come upon a park in which sits the oldest house in Boston, the James Blake House.
From Wikipedia: The house was built around 1661 by James Blake, an English immigrant. The Blake family owned the house until 1825 when it was acquired by the Williams family. In 1891 the City of Boston acquired the house. In order to preserve the house from demolition in 1896 the Dorchester Historical Society acquired the property from the City and moved the house less than 500 feet from its original location by Massachusetts Avenue to its current location.
According to the Dorchester Historical Society Webpage, The house is one of only a few examples of West England country framing in the United States. Most of the early colonial homes in Dorchester, such as the Pierce House, were built by housewrights from the south and east of England, where brick and plaster building predominated. However, the Blake House was built in the manner of the homes of western England, which had long used heavy timber-framing methods. If you’re in the area, tours are given on the third Sunday of every month.
Though it may not be clear due to the size of the photo, the house has original leaded, diamond-pane windows. This type of window was employed as the technology for creating large panes of glass had yet to be invented. I find this house and its location charming, and always enjoy passing by.
Across the street sits the William E Russell School, a public elementary school, which occupies a handsome brick building built in 1903. Russell, a native of Cambridge, served as Mayor of Cambridge and Governor of Massachusetts (1890-1892). The school has approximately 368 students and is still going strong at 110.
As a more recent development, I suspect that my neighborhood has the largest sculpture of a pear in the world. Don’t laugh. Being first in bronze fruit is not to be denigrated. Though I couldn’t document the size record easily via Google, it appears that “bronze pear sculpture” isn’t even a hotly contested category. Ours is approximately eleven and a half feet high.
About six or seven years ago, the city spent some money to beautify Edward Everett Square, and part of that improvement was to install this sculpture of a Dorchester Clapp Pear, which was first grown here in the 1840’s when much of the immediately surrounding area was still farmland. While I’ve come to like the sculpture, I have to confess that the first time I saw it, I nearly crashed my car into it. It was at night, and the city had reclaimed some of the street just beyond one of our famous 5-street intersections, to site the sculpture. I hadn’t driven there for a few weeks, and suddenly this THING was in my path. Only a very quick swerve preserved our record in bronze fruit.
Finally, I’ll wrap up with a photo taken from next to the Dorchester Yacht Club (founded 1870) showing the beach and bay at sunset. This is a great spot to stroll, rollerblade, or walk your dog. In the summer, there are lots of families on the beach, and the water is calm enough that even young children can swim. I personally swim there when the water’s warm enough, usually June through September. There’s also a baseball diamond and playground out of view to the left.
I really like the historical character of my neighborhood and Boston. I’ve always loved old things, and that may also explain why I love Mexico City so much. Its European history is about 100 years older than Boston’s, and its indigenous history is on a par with Rome’s.
What are some of the interesting things about your neighborhood?
Jacqueline Nunez said:
Hi. I came across your blog while researching photos of Savin Hill. The gorgeous photo from DYC at sunset is stunning. My partner and I live in Savin Hill on Malibu Beach. It’s nice to read someone who is blogging about our neighborhood. Great work and great blog!
LikeLike
Kim G said:
Hi Jacqueline! Thanks for the lovely comment. As you can see, I’m blogging very little these days. But any future comment (using the same name/email) will be immediately approved in the future. Saludos and thanks for stopping by!
LikeLike
Pingback: Roam Around Ringwood | The Mexile
Laurie said:
I love Boston. I love the whole state, in fact. If I were very rich, I would buy a place in upstate Massachusetts on the coast. It would be my home to escape the heat of the dry season of Central America. I loved the pictures. I have published several photo essays of New Orleans, but I would need to put the links or a search button up for you to find the posts. I will one day when I find some time.
LikeLike
Kim G said:
The north shore is lovely, with its craggy, rugged coast. Cape Ann has some very nice spots, and overall MA is a great place to spend the summer. You’ll laugh at people who complain it’s “hot and humid,” which they define as mid to upper 80’s with 60% humidity. Anyone from the Gulf Coast would kill for such “heat and humidity,” LOL. It also cools off every night. I’ll have to look around on your blog for the New Orleans photos. I visited once in 1986 or thereabouts, and would like to go back some day. Thanks for the compliments on the photos. Saludos, Kim
LikeLike
garydenness said:
A thoroughly enjoyable stroll around Boston. My instinctive reaction is one of preference to the East Coast of the US rather than the West Coast. Familiarity, perhaps. I suspect, though, that my instincts are rubbish and I’d much prefer life on the West Coast.
The original Dorchester is just a short drive from where I sit now. My brother lives there. Does this beat Steve’s six degrees of separation? I think probably not. We do have a ton of witches nearby though, including those of the quaint New Forest town of Burley, and those of the more far more infamous, but slightly more distant, Glastonbury.
You’ve laid down the gauntlet. I guess I’d best tour my own town now. See if I can’t find something older than May 30th 1630 in my hood.
Regarding your blog:
I don’t know how it appears on your blog, but ‘Musings from Boston, Mexico City, and Beyond!’ spills into two lines. I’m sure it would look nicer on one line. I’ve thought about this for weeks, but the thing is I can’t think of a way to abbreviate it in a consistent and elegant fashion. So this is a pointless comment. I obviously have too much time on my hands tonight, and am using it unproductively.
Also, those photos are beautiful. But embedded in the blog, they look incredibly compressed and pixelated. I have a Chrome plugin which allows me to hover the cursor over an image and an enlarged pop out of the photo is produced, and your photos appear in their full, uncompressed glory. )
LikeLike
Kim G said:
I’d love to see a tour of your town. Creating this blog post was pretty interesting for me, as I had to do a bit more research into the things I pass every day. So I learned something myself.
As for my blog, thanks for the comments. Is your browser letting the page choose its own fonts? I had the same problem with the title (and unreadable dashboard fonts) until I let my browser (Firefox) allow the page’s fonts. And once I did that, the page looked a whole lot better.
As for the pictures, I’m particularly glad you commented. In fact, I’ve been thinking of sending you an email for advice. When I took your tips and reset the photos to 100% width, some of them started to look blurry occasionally on my browser. Especially on the desktop. On the laptop they look fine most of the time. When you click on them, they look great as they fill the whole screen. The problem is that the column width is about 576 pixels, and even though the photos are 864 pixels wide (landscape orientation), WordPress seems (at some level) to think they are 300 px wide.
Any thoughts? I took the photos with a very good lens, and processed them carefully, so they’re sharp. But WordPress displays them as blurry. I did some Googling on this, but didn’t come up with any satisfactory answers.
And particularly, thanks for the kind comments on the photos. I value your photographic eye highly.
LikeLike
Kim G said:
P.S. If I could move the search box (which I don’t think I can), the whole page would look better. Given the overall elegance of the Chateau theme, it’s an odd place to jam in a search box.
LikeLike
garydenness said:
I think you’re stuck with the search box where it is. Which is a shame, because that would be the perfect solution!
Incidentally, WordPress’ search function is a big weak point. It’s pretty rubbish in fact. If I want to find an old post and type in something reasonably specific, it will return a lot of rubbish results, and I’ll need to sometimes trawl through pages of them to find what I’m looking for.
So I use Google instead, and usually find the right post straight away.
LikeLike
Andean said:
Great job on pics — blur free here now.
LikeLike
Kim G said:
Thanks so much for coming back and checking. So you saw them as blurry too the first time?
LikeLike
garydenness said:
I must confess I know little of the town I live in, although I do know it is properly ancient. As in, well over a 1,000 years old. I look forward to finding out more about it.
Images: when you add an image to a post, you get an option on the right hand side of the media box. The final option is for size. Are you selecting Medium? If so, try choosing large (or even full size). If you’re already doing that, then I’ll have to think of something different….
LikeLike
Kim G said:
That would jibe with what my Google searches revealed. But I think it has to be done when the photo is added. I tried to go back to see if there was some kind of option to do it to existing media, but it would appear not.
LikeLike
garydenness said:
I just did a test post, selecting ‘Medium’ with the image, changing the width to 100% and going to preview. I got a blurred image, which looks great when viewed full size. I think this might be the issue….
LikeLike
Andean said:
Kim, the last pic was especially so, but now it’s very clear even when I enlarge it.
LikeLike
Kim G said:
Thanks a million! I was worried about this last night, but wasn’t sure if it was just my desktop computer or what. I’m thankful to have (with Gary’s help) solved the problem. Since I’m definitely into photography, I was distressed that my pictures were coming out blurry.
LikeLike
garydenness said:
Try editing a post, delete the image, then re-upload it and insert it where it is meant to be.
LikeLike
Kim G said:
OK, I may have figured it out. The size is not an option when uploading the photo, but it is when inserting the photo into the post. So far I keep all of my photos in my WordPress account. Since I shrink them to 4″x6″ x 144 PPI, they don’t take up much space. So when I insert a photo into a post, there’s a scroll bar that you have to scroll down to select the picture size. I just did this to the first photo. If you’re still there, do you mind checking to see if it looks better? I’m booting the desktop as we chat to see if it worked there.
LikeLike
garydenness said:
Kim, that’s nailed it. The images are now blur free! 🙂
LikeLike
Kim G said:
Woo hoo!!! (And my desktop just decided that this moment was the perfect time to have problems, LOL…)
LikeLike
John Calypso said:
Some inexplicable reason I do not warm to the East Coast. I lived in Newington, Connecticut for a couple years; and Manhattan for a couple more – soooo different from the West. Nice photos in any case 😉
LikeLike
Kim G said:
Thanks John. As you may know, I’m originally from San Francisco. Though I love my neighborhood, I still feel a bit psychographically like a fish out of water even after 18 years in Boston. As you know, this is a VERY different place. Thanks for noticing the photos!
LikeLike
Andean said:
What a great house in the second photo! I wish I had a park across the way to tobaggon in, and I would. And you even have a beach close by!!
One of the best features of my suburban area is the proximity (driving wise) to NYC.
LikeLike
Kim G said:
I loved that house too, and especially the fact that its own color set off the fall colors around it. Unfortunately my own house isn’t quite as nice, but I do have a garage, which I think that house lacks. And yes, I love my immediate neighborhood. When I bought the house, it wasn’t that expensive, which surprised me a lot given the amenities. Prices have risen a lot since then. Saludos.
LikeLike
Steve Cotton said:
Your neighborhood is not a stranger to my family. We had three births there between 1638 and 1701 — and three deaths between 1691 and 1732. I am willing to bet you might find some Clapps in your burial ground.
And then there is the Salem Witch trial. One of my ancestors was convicted of being a witch. Tie that fact to my family’s notoriety for spawning the first person to be hanged in Massachusetts Bay Colony, and you might have some idea why my the rest of us are in Oregon, rather than on the heights of Dorchester.
LikeLike
Kim G said:
Well, three hundred-odd years, and six degrees of separation! As for the Clapps, they developed the Dorchester Clapp pear, memorialized in the sculpture, and farmed a big plot of land. In fact, looking closely at the plaque I posted, there is an Ebenezer Clapp listed as buried in 1881.
As for the witch trials in Salem, I can understand why your surviving relatives hightailed it west.
Saludos
LikeLike
Felipe Zapata said:
Better than Mexico City in many respects.
LikeLike
Kim G said:
Both have their pros and cons. Mexico City is a much more interesting place to be than Boston, but of course the tradeoff is in terms of clean air and safety.
LikeLike